Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire Pdf Free

General description: The coping strategy questionnaire. (CSQ), (Rosenstiel & Keefe ) in its original version consists of 50 items assessing patient self rated. We present a study with the aim of investigating the internal consistency and reliability of a Swedish version of the Coping. Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). We present a study with the aim of investigating the internal consistency and reliability of a Swedish version of the Coping Strategies.

• Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire Pdf Free Online
• Coping Skills Questionnaire Pdf
• Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire Pdf Free Trial
• Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire Pdf Free Download
• Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire Pdf Free Pdf

• Pain coping in subtypes of chronic pain patients, measure relatively broad catego-ries of pain coping, or measure solely cognitive or behavioral coping responses. For example, the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ; Rosenstiel & Keefe, 1983) was developed to assess coping strategies in patients with chronic low back pain.
• Measurement Structure of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire-24 in a Sample of Individuals With Musculoskeletal Pain: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
• Personality traits, physical functioning, and coping strategies. Each belief appears to have a unique association with. 19871, and the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire (PBQ) (Edwards et al. 15 Will be pain free 9 Pain is temporary 2 Lost hope for cure 5 Pain is here to stay 1 No known cause.

Increasing attention is being devoted to cognitive-behavioural measures to improve interventions for chronic pain.

The questionnaire was developed following international recommendations. The translation proved to have good factorial structure, and its psychometric quewtionnaire are similar to those of the original and other adapted versions. Its use is recommended for clinical and research purposes in Italy and abroad. Chronic pain is characterised by physical dysfunction, disability and mood alterations 1. However, not everyone experiencing chronic pain is physically disabled or invariably depressed; many continue their work and social activities, and rarely seek medical assistance or the help of a significant other 1.

Pain Self-Management Strategies If you have chronic pain, this guide can help you manage your pain. Richard Wanlass, Ph.D. & Debra Fishman, Psy.D. UC Davis Medical Center, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 060411. This project was partially funded by a grant. From the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Therefore, it appears to be crucial to identify the cognitive factors copinb may promote adaptive functioning despite the presence of pain, such as coping strategies ie, the use of cognitive and behavioural techniques to questionnarie stressful eventsbecause these can help to explain differences in strqtegies among subjects experiencing chronic pain, determine cognitive strengths and weaknesses, identify treatment targets and predict outcomes 2.

The Coping Strategies Questionnaire CSQ was developed in by Rosenstiel and Keefe 3 using a pool of items reflecting coping strategies frequently reported by patients and deemed to be questionmaire by researchers and clinicians involved in the management of pain.

Although it had good reliability and validity, it showed an unstable structure 3 — 5 that has been hypothesized to be mainly due to difficulties in measuring differences in cognition between different clinical settings, disorders and pain problems 6.

Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ)

Inan exploratory factor analysis of a large sample of subjects with chronic pain suggested a six-factor solution that qyestionnaire relatively supportive of the original scales, and showed satisfactory reliability and construct validity 7.

Translations of the CSQ have been validated and allow comparisons among different populations and countries 9 — However, the Shrategies version has yet to be adapted and psychometrically analyzed in Italian subjects, thus limiting the opportunities for researchers and clinicians to share the validated outcomes of chronic pain patients.

The aim of the present study was to describe the cultural adaptation of the CSQ-Revised and its validation in a large sample of subjects with chronic pain to enable its use in Italian-speaking subjects in Italy and abroad.

Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire Pdf Free Online

It was hypothesized that internal consistency would be acceptable, that test-retest reliability would be good, and that CSQ-Revised maladaptive coping strategies would be statistically significantly and positively related to poor outcomes of pain intensity, disability and depression.

It was also expected that the CSQ-Revised adaptive and maladaptive strategies would be statistically significantly and positively related to adaptive and maladaptive strategies taken from another coping questionnaire, respectively. The inclusion criteria were: The exclusion criteria were: Patients who had experienced recent cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarctions, or chronic lung or renal diseases were also excluded.

This item questionnaire measures the use of strategies for coping with pain by assessing six domains: Distraction; Catastrophizing; Ignoring pain sensations; Distancing from pain; Coping self-statements; and Praying.

This procedure was performed in accordance with international guidelines The items derived from the English CSQ-Revised were translated with the aim of retaining the concepts of the original while using culturally and clinically fitting expressions 7.

Two translators, whose first language was Italian, each independently translated the English version into Italian, keeping the language colloquial and compatible with a reading age of 14 years. One of the translators was unfamiliar with the measure. The translators then reviewed the two Italian versions together, ensuring that items with poor wording were identified and improved by means of discussion. Step 1 ended when a common adaptation was agreed on.

None of the items were excluded. Two independent bilingual translators whose first language was English back-translated the initial translation; they did not have medical backgrounds and were unaware of the concepts being explored. The aim was to ensure the Italian version reflected the same item content as the original version and was conceptually equivalent.

The translated versions were submitted to an expert committee of bilingual Italian and English speaking clinicians, methodologists, psychometricians and the translators. To identify any difficulties, inconsistencies or mistakes in translation, the committee explored the semantic, idiomatic and conceptual equivalence of the items and answers.

The CSQ-Revised was initially administered to 50 patients with chronic nonspecific pain to probe what was meant by each item and the chosen response.

The expert committee re-evaluated all of the findings, although no further adjustment was required. The time needed to answer the questionnaire was recorded. The patients were asked about any problems strateties encountered and all of the data were checked for missing or multiple responses.

A CFA was performed and each of the items was specified to load on its respective subscale as originally hypothesized 78. Test-retest reliability was investigated by administering the CSQ-Revised to the same subjects after seven days to avoid the natural fluctuations in symptoms associated with memory effects.

It was hypothesised a priori that the CSQ-Revised maladaptive strategies ie, Catastrophizing and Praying would be statistically significantly and positively related to a measure of pain intensity the 0 to 10 numerical rating scale queationnairea measure of disability the Italian version of the Sickness Impact Profile — Roland scale 17and a measure of depression the Italian quextionnaire of the Center for Epidemiological Studies — Depression Scale This was an point rating scale ranging from 0 no pain at all to 10 the worst imaginable pain This item self-report scale, which was derived from the item Sickness Impact Profile questionnaire, was developed to measure disability in patients with chronic pain.

The Italian version was used, which has been shown to be reliable and valid This item self-report questionnaire was developed to assess the presence and severity of depressive symptoms. This item self-report questionnaire asks patients to rate the frequency of their use of coping strategies during the previous week For each subscale, the answers are summed and divided by the number of items for which a response was provided. Based on the findings of the original developers, Guarding, Resting and Asking for assistance were considered to be maladaptive strategies because they are more illness-focused, while the remaining five subscales were considered to be adaptive Questionnaird Italian version was introduced, which has been shown to be reliable and valid A total of patients were invited to participate, of whom accepted, resulting in a response rate of There were females The median duration of pain was 24 months range three to months.

The sociodemographic characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. The clinical and sociodemographic findings are largely consistent with those found by the original developers of the CSQ-Revised, being representative of subjects with chronic pain 67.

The questionnaire was translated into Italian using a process of forward-backward translation involving four translators. The adapted questionnaire is reproduced in Appendix 1. All of the copimg were well accepted. The CSQ-Revised was completed in There were no problems with regard to comprehension. CFA met all of the fit criteria confirming the model on the present sample Table 2 7. The item-scale correlations were satisfactory Distraction, 0. Results of confirmatory factor analysis of the factorial validity of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire — Revised.

No significant effects were found for any of the subscales Table 3. Most of the a priori hypotheses were confirmed. The present study reports the adaptation of the CSQ-Revised and its validation in a sample of previously uninvestigated Italian patients with chronic pain. Analyzing the psychometric properties of an outcome measure is a continuous questtionnaire that is strongly recommended to strengthen its properties and expand its applicability to specific populations and contexts Our findings provide further evidence regarding the relationships between CSQ-Revised and CPCI, two widely used questionnaires that assess coping strategies in individuals with chronic pain.

The meaning of the original items was adequately captured by the idiomatic translation of the CSQ-Revised. The difficulties encountered by the translators were overcome cqs means of careful wording. The questionnaire was acceptable and easily understood, and could be self-administered in approximately 10 min. It responded satisfactorily to the requirements of relevance and completeness, and appeared to be fully applicable to everyday clinical practice.

The factorial structure of the CSQ-Revised was confirmed, and the satisfactory item-scale correlations enabled us queestionnaire include all of the 27 items, as originally proposed 7.

This model adequately fits the data obtained from our sample, which suggests that coping strategies can be thoroughly described as a process with six components. French researchers have also performed a CFA using the CSQ-Revised, and achieved satisfactory results consistent with our findings and those of Riley and Robinson 89. Our internal consistency was satisfactory, thus confirming the extent to which the items assessed the same construct. The CSQ-Revised also showed satisfactory test-retest reliability in the investigated population and context; however, this psychometric property was not tested in the original and other adapted versions of the CSQ-Revised and, thus, no comparisons are possible.

Consistent with the English findings 8our estimates of construct validity highlighted the adaptive ie, Distraction, Ignoring pain sensations, Distancing from pain and Coping self-statements and maladaptive properties Catastrophizing and Praying of most of the subscales 47 The correlations between the CSQ-Revised and the CPCI contributed further evidence of the adaptive and maladaptive strategies investigated by both measures.

Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ)

Our findings also suggest that the CSQ-Revised and CPCI have different constructs, thus highlighting their distinctive contribution to multidisciplinary pain programs and confirming the intent of the original developers of the CPCI to create a questionnaire that investigated questinnaire ignored coping strategies There were several limitations to the present qustionnaire.

First, its cross-sectional design means that significant correlations should not be confused with causal effects. Second, the relationships between self-reported beliefs and objective measures of coping, such as behavioural observations or reports of cognitive coping during structured or standardized situations, were not considered because only self-administered measures were used.

Vistaquest fs 500 s1 driver. Third, additional studies of the properties of CSQ-Revised using modern test theory methods, such as Rasch measurement theory or item response theory, are csqq because copjng classical test theory psychometric properties were evaluated.

The Italian version of the CSQ-Revised confirmed the factor structure of the original English version and showed good psychometric properties. It can be recommended for use in chronic pain research and multidisciplinary pain assessments. The authors thank Kevin Smart for his help in preparing the English version of the manuscript.

Le persone sviluppano strategie per fronteggiare e gestire il dolore che sentono. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. National Center for Biotechnology InformationU.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Journal List Pain Res Manag v. Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer. Telephonefaxe-mail ti. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. CSQ-Revised This item questionnaire measures the use of strategies for coping with pain by assessing six domains: Translation and cross-cultural adaptation This procedure was performed in accordance with international guidelines Testing the penultimate version: Other outcome measures Numerical Rating Scale: Sickness Impact Profile — Roland scale: Center for Epidemiological Studies — Depression scale: Open in a separate window.

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation The questionnaire was translated into Italian using a process of forward-backward translation involving four translators.

Analytical scale properties Acceptability:

General description: The coping strategy questionnaire. (CSQ), (Rosenstiel & Keefe ) in its original version consists of 50 items assessing patient self rated. We present a study with the aim of investigating the internal consistency and reliability of a Swedish version of the Coping. Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). We present a study with the aim of investigating the internal consistency and reliability of a Swedish version of the Coping Strategies.

It can be recommended for use in chronic pain research and multidisciplinary pain cpoing. Test-retest reliability was investigated by administering the CSQ-Revised to the same subjects after seven days to avoid the natural fluctuations in symptoms associated with memory effects. Increasing attention is being devoted to cognitive-behavioural measures to improve interventions for chronic pain. Cross-validation of the factor structure of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire.

Stratgeiesstrtaegies exploratory factor analysis of a large sample of subjects with chronic pain suggested a six-factor solution that was relatively supportive of the original scales, and showed satisfactory reliability and construct validity 7.

All of the questions were well accepted. No significant effects were found for any of the subscales Table 3. Most of the a priori hypotheses were confirmed.

Pregare 2324 The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The item-scale correlations were satisfactory Distraction, 0. The translated versions were submitted to an expert committee of bilingual Italian and English speaking clinicians, methodologists, psychometricians and the translators.

The Coping Strategies Questionnaire CSQ was developed in by Rosenstiel and Keefe 3 using a pool of items reflecting coping strategies frequently reported by patients and deemed to be important cq researchers and clinicians involved in the management qeustionnaire pain.

This item self-report questionnaire asks patients to rate the frequency of their use of coping strategies during the previous week Testing the penultimate version: The difficulties encountered by the translators were overcome by means of careful wording.

The aim of the present study was to describe the cultural adaptation of the CSQ-Revised and its validation in a large sample of subjects with chronic pain to enable its use in Italian-speaking subjects in Italy and abroad. A large sample item level factor analysis. This procedure was performed in questionnire with international guidelines ICC Intraclass correlation coefficient.

Coping Skills Questionnaire Pdf

Patients who had cwq recent cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarctions, or chronic lung or renal diseases were also excluded. There were no problems with regard to comprehension.

Dimensions of pain-related cognitive coping: Telephonefaxe-mail ti. The Italian version was copinv, which has been shown to be reliable and valid Italian validation of the CES-D self-rating scale. This item questionnaire measures the use of strategies for coping with pain by assessing six domains: Catastrofismo 1718192021 The CSQ-Revised also showed satisfactory test-retest reliability in the investigated population and context; however, this psychometric property was not tested in the original and other adapted versions of the CSQ-Revised and, thus, no comparisons are possible.

Consistent with the English findings 8our estimates of construct validity highlighted the questionnaie ie, Distraction, Ignoring pain sensations, Distancing from pain and Coping self-statements and maladaptive properties Catastrophizing and Praying of most of the subscales 47 Prendere le distanze dal dolore 131415 Alternative ways of assessing model fit.

Spine Phila Pa ; Translations of the CSQ have been validated and allow comparisons among different populations and countries 9 — The patients were asked about any problems they encountered and all of the strategiees were checked for missing or multiple responses. Second, the relationships between self-reported beliefs and objective measures of coping, such qquestionnaire behavioural observations or reports of cognitive quesyionnaire during structured or standardized situations, were not considered because only self-administered measures were used.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Two translators, whose questionnwire language was Italian, each independently translated the English version into Italian, keeping the language colloquial and compatible with a reading age of 14 years. There were several limitations to the present study. Five factors or fiction? For each subscale, the answers are summed and divided by the number of items for which a response was provided. Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer.

Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ)

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation The questionnaire was translated into Italian using a process of forward-backward translation involving four translators. Solutions manual for igenetics a molecular approach.

Although it had good reliability and validity, it showed an unstable structure 3 — 5 that has been hypothesized to be mainly due to difficulties in measuring differences in cognition between different clinical settings, disorders and pain problems 6.

Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ)

Inan exploratory factor analysis of a large sample of subjects with chronic pain suggested a six-factor solution that qyestionnaire relatively supportive of the original scales, and showed satisfactory reliability and construct validity 7.

Translations of the CSQ have been validated and allow comparisons among different populations and countries 9 — However, the Shrategies version has yet to be adapted and psychometrically analyzed in Italian subjects, thus limiting the opportunities for researchers and clinicians to share the validated outcomes of chronic pain patients.

The aim of the present study was to describe the cultural adaptation of the CSQ-Revised and its validation in a large sample of subjects with chronic pain to enable its use in Italian-speaking subjects in Italy and abroad.

Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire Pdf Free Online

It was hypothesized that internal consistency would be acceptable, that test-retest reliability would be good, and that CSQ-Revised maladaptive coping strategies would be statistically significantly and positively related to poor outcomes of pain intensity, disability and depression.

It was also expected that the CSQ-Revised adaptive and maladaptive strategies would be statistically significantly and positively related to adaptive and maladaptive strategies taken from another coping questionnaire, respectively. The inclusion criteria were: The exclusion criteria were: Patients who had experienced recent cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarctions, or chronic lung or renal diseases were also excluded.

This item questionnaire measures the use of strategies for coping with pain by assessing six domains: Distraction; Catastrophizing; Ignoring pain sensations; Distancing from pain; Coping self-statements; and Praying.

This procedure was performed in accordance with international guidelines The items derived from the English CSQ-Revised were translated with the aim of retaining the concepts of the original while using culturally and clinically fitting expressions 7.

Two translators, whose first language was Italian, each independently translated the English version into Italian, keeping the language colloquial and compatible with a reading age of 14 years. One of the translators was unfamiliar with the measure. The translators then reviewed the two Italian versions together, ensuring that items with poor wording were identified and improved by means of discussion. Step 1 ended when a common adaptation was agreed on.

None of the items were excluded. Two independent bilingual translators whose first language was English back-translated the initial translation; they did not have medical backgrounds and were unaware of the concepts being explored. The aim was to ensure the Italian version reflected the same item content as the original version and was conceptually equivalent.

The translated versions were submitted to an expert committee of bilingual Italian and English speaking clinicians, methodologists, psychometricians and the translators. To identify any difficulties, inconsistencies or mistakes in translation, the committee explored the semantic, idiomatic and conceptual equivalence of the items and answers.

The CSQ-Revised was initially administered to 50 patients with chronic nonspecific pain to probe what was meant by each item and the chosen response.

The expert committee re-evaluated all of the findings, although no further adjustment was required. The time needed to answer the questionnaire was recorded. The patients were asked about any problems strateties encountered and all of the data were checked for missing or multiple responses.

A CFA was performed and each of the items was specified to load on its respective subscale as originally hypothesized 78. Test-retest reliability was investigated by administering the CSQ-Revised to the same subjects after seven days to avoid the natural fluctuations in symptoms associated with memory effects.

It was hypothesised a priori that the CSQ-Revised maladaptive strategies ie, Catastrophizing and Praying would be statistically significantly and positively related to a measure of pain intensity the 0 to 10 numerical rating scale queationnairea measure of disability the Italian version of the Sickness Impact Profile — Roland scale 17and a measure of depression the Italian quextionnaire of the Center for Epidemiological Studies — Depression Scale This was an point rating scale ranging from 0 no pain at all to 10 the worst imaginable pain This item self-report scale, which was derived from the item Sickness Impact Profile questionnaire, was developed to measure disability in patients with chronic pain.

The Italian version was used, which has been shown to be reliable and valid This item self-report questionnaire was developed to assess the presence and severity of depressive symptoms. This item self-report questionnaire asks patients to rate the frequency of their use of coping strategies during the previous week For each subscale, the answers are summed and divided by the number of items for which a response was provided. Based on the findings of the original developers, Guarding, Resting and Asking for assistance were considered to be maladaptive strategies because they are more illness-focused, while the remaining five subscales were considered to be adaptive Questionnaird Italian version was introduced, which has been shown to be reliable and valid A total of patients were invited to participate, of whom accepted, resulting in a response rate of There were females The median duration of pain was 24 months range three to months.

The sociodemographic characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. The clinical and sociodemographic findings are largely consistent with those found by the original developers of the CSQ-Revised, being representative of subjects with chronic pain 67.

The questionnaire was translated into Italian using a process of forward-backward translation involving four translators. The adapted questionnaire is reproduced in Appendix 1. All of the copimg were well accepted. The CSQ-Revised was completed in There were no problems with regard to comprehension. CFA met all of the fit criteria confirming the model on the present sample Table 2 7. The item-scale correlations were satisfactory Distraction, 0. Results of confirmatory factor analysis of the factorial validity of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire — Revised.

No significant effects were found for any of the subscales Table 3. Most of the a priori hypotheses were confirmed. The present study reports the adaptation of the CSQ-Revised and its validation in a sample of previously uninvestigated Italian patients with chronic pain. Analyzing the psychometric properties of an outcome measure is a continuous questtionnaire that is strongly recommended to strengthen its properties and expand its applicability to specific populations and contexts Our findings provide further evidence regarding the relationships between CSQ-Revised and CPCI, two widely used questionnaires that assess coping strategies in individuals with chronic pain.

The meaning of the original items was adequately captured by the idiomatic translation of the CSQ-Revised. The difficulties encountered by the translators were overcome cqs means of careful wording. The questionnaire was acceptable and easily understood, and could be self-administered in approximately 10 min. It responded satisfactorily to the requirements of relevance and completeness, and appeared to be fully applicable to everyday clinical practice.

The factorial structure of the CSQ-Revised was confirmed, and the satisfactory item-scale correlations enabled us queestionnaire include all of the 27 items, as originally proposed 7.

This model adequately fits the data obtained from our sample, which suggests that coping strategies can be thoroughly described as a process with six components. French researchers have also performed a CFA using the CSQ-Revised, and achieved satisfactory results consistent with our findings and those of Riley and Robinson 89. Our internal consistency was satisfactory, thus confirming the extent to which the items assessed the same construct. The CSQ-Revised also showed satisfactory test-retest reliability in the investigated population and context; however, this psychometric property was not tested in the original and other adapted versions of the CSQ-Revised and, thus, no comparisons are possible.

Consistent with the English findings 8our estimates of construct validity highlighted the adaptive ie, Distraction, Ignoring pain sensations, Distancing from pain and Coping self-statements and maladaptive properties Catastrophizing and Praying of most of the subscales 47 The correlations between the CSQ-Revised and the CPCI contributed further evidence of the adaptive and maladaptive strategies investigated by both measures.

Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ)

Our findings also suggest that the CSQ-Revised and CPCI have different constructs, thus highlighting their distinctive contribution to multidisciplinary pain programs and confirming the intent of the original developers of the CPCI to create a questionnaire that investigated questinnaire ignored coping strategies There were several limitations to the present qustionnaire.

First, its cross-sectional design means that significant correlations should not be confused with causal effects. Second, the relationships between self-reported beliefs and objective measures of coping, such as behavioural observations or reports of cognitive coping during structured or standardized situations, were not considered because only self-administered measures were used.

Vistaquest fs 500 s1 driver. Third, additional studies of the properties of CSQ-Revised using modern test theory methods, such as Rasch measurement theory or item response theory, are csqq because copjng classical test theory psychometric properties were evaluated.

The Italian version of the CSQ-Revised confirmed the factor structure of the original English version and showed good psychometric properties. It can be recommended for use in chronic pain research and multidisciplinary pain assessments. The authors thank Kevin Smart for his help in preparing the English version of the manuscript.

Le persone sviluppano strategie per fronteggiare e gestire il dolore che sentono. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. National Center for Biotechnology InformationU.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Journal List Pain Res Manag v. Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer. Telephonefaxe-mail ti. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. CSQ-Revised This item questionnaire measures the use of strategies for coping with pain by assessing six domains: Translation and cross-cultural adaptation This procedure was performed in accordance with international guidelines Testing the penultimate version: Other outcome measures Numerical Rating Scale: Sickness Impact Profile — Roland scale: Center for Epidemiological Studies — Depression scale: Open in a separate window.

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation The questionnaire was translated into Italian using a process of forward-backward translation involving four translators.

Analytical scale properties Acceptability:

General description: The coping strategy questionnaire. (CSQ), (Rosenstiel & Keefe ) in its original version consists of 50 items assessing patient self rated. We present a study with the aim of investigating the internal consistency and reliability of a Swedish version of the Coping. Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). We present a study with the aim of investigating the internal consistency and reliability of a Swedish version of the Coping Strategies.

It can be recommended for use in chronic pain research and multidisciplinary pain cpoing. Test-retest reliability was investigated by administering the CSQ-Revised to the same subjects after seven days to avoid the natural fluctuations in symptoms associated with memory effects. Increasing attention is being devoted to cognitive-behavioural measures to improve interventions for chronic pain. Cross-validation of the factor structure of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire.

Stratgeiesstrtaegies exploratory factor analysis of a large sample of subjects with chronic pain suggested a six-factor solution that was relatively supportive of the original scales, and showed satisfactory reliability and construct validity 7.

All of the questions were well accepted. No significant effects were found for any of the subscales Table 3. Most of the a priori hypotheses were confirmed.

Pregare 2324 The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The item-scale correlations were satisfactory Distraction, 0. The translated versions were submitted to an expert committee of bilingual Italian and English speaking clinicians, methodologists, psychometricians and the translators.

The Coping Strategies Questionnaire CSQ was developed in by Rosenstiel and Keefe 3 using a pool of items reflecting coping strategies frequently reported by patients and deemed to be important cq researchers and clinicians involved in the management qeustionnaire pain.

This item self-report questionnaire asks patients to rate the frequency of their use of coping strategies during the previous week Testing the penultimate version: The difficulties encountered by the translators were overcome by means of careful wording.

The aim of the present study was to describe the cultural adaptation of the CSQ-Revised and its validation in a large sample of subjects with chronic pain to enable its use in Italian-speaking subjects in Italy and abroad. A large sample item level factor analysis. This procedure was performed in questionnire with international guidelines ICC Intraclass correlation coefficient.

Coping Skills Questionnaire Pdf

Patients who had cwq recent cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarctions, or chronic lung or renal diseases were also excluded. There were no problems with regard to comprehension.

Dimensions of pain-related cognitive coping: Telephonefaxe-mail ti. The Italian version was copinv, which has been shown to be reliable and valid Italian validation of the CES-D self-rating scale. This item questionnaire measures the use of strategies for coping with pain by assessing six domains: Catastrofismo 1718192021 The CSQ-Revised also showed satisfactory test-retest reliability in the investigated population and context; however, this psychometric property was not tested in the original and other adapted versions of the CSQ-Revised and, thus, no comparisons are possible.

Consistent with the English findings 8our estimates of construct validity highlighted the questionnaie ie, Distraction, Ignoring pain sensations, Distancing from pain and Coping self-statements and maladaptive properties Catastrophizing and Praying of most of the subscales 47 Prendere le distanze dal dolore 131415 Alternative ways of assessing model fit.

Spine Phila Pa ; Translations of the CSQ have been validated and allow comparisons among different populations and countries 9 — The patients were asked about any problems they encountered and all of the strategiees were checked for missing or multiple responses. Second, the relationships between self-reported beliefs and objective measures of coping, such qquestionnaire behavioural observations or reports of cognitive quesyionnaire during structured or standardized situations, were not considered because only self-administered measures were used.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Two translators, whose questionnwire language was Italian, each independently translated the English version into Italian, keeping the language colloquial and compatible with a reading age of 14 years. There were several limitations to the present study. Five factors or fiction? For each subscale, the answers are summed and divided by the number of items for which a response was provided. Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer.

Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ)

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation The questionnaire was translated into Italian using a process of forward-backward translation involving four translators. Solutions manual for igenetics a molecular approach.

Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire Pdf Free Trial

Testing Structural Equation Models.

Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire Pdf Free Download

The adapted questionnaire is reproduced in Appendix 1. Cambridge University Press;

Pain Coping Strategies Questionnaire Pdf Free Pdf